paxamericana:

motherjones:

We learned something new today. Er.

(via)

These are all unenforceable, so I don’t really see the point of this post.

If you look hard enough at most states, I’m pretty sure they all have laws on the books that are illegal but were never removed for various reasons.

"What looks like politics, and imagines itself to be political, will one day unmask itself as a religious movement."

Søren Kierkegaard (via lucjanlocke)

CHRISORBALLOON THIS IS THE QUOTE I MEANT

(via hookedonsemiotics)

Pope Shenouda III  was arguably one of the most important figures of 20th century Egypt, and one of his ancient church’s most transformative figures.  Shenouda  guided his flock, the largest congregation of Christians in the Middle East, to massive political, social, economic and religious change. In doing so he broke with tradition of a more spiritual role for the pope and embraced a political role that made him  one of the pivotal figures of the last 40 years. on this blog in the past I have been critical of the Pope, notably for his for his politicization of the church, his  autocratic tendencies,  and misplaced bet on the Mubarak regime — most notably his unprecedented 2005 endorsement of the reelection of Hosni Mubarak.

But I’ll leave discussion of that to another day, and  instead urge you to read this overview of his life by one of the best non-Egyptian experts on the church and religious life in Egypt, Cornelius Hulsman of the Arab West Report:

Egyptian Christians are mourning the death of Coptic Orthodox Pope and Patriarch Shenouda III, who passed away on Saturday at the age of 88. Pope Shenouda (August 3, 1923 - March 17, 2012) was extremely popular among millions of common Christians. A charismatic reformer and an advocate of Christian rights and interests in a predominantly Muslim country, many considered him as their father. Common Muslims liked him for his critical stance towards Israel, but both Christian and Muslim intellectuals were critical of his mixing politics with religion. No doubt he was the most influential Christian leader in 20th century Egypt. He was co-founder and editor-in-chief of the Sunday School Magazine in 1947, was consecrated as monk in 1954, became Bishop of Education in 1962, and Pope in 1971.

Metropolitan Bishoi, secretary of the Synod since 1985, described in 2002 the dramatic changes during Pope Shenouda’s reign. The number of monks, priests, bishops, church servants, and churches dramatically increased. Monasteries expanded as never before since the arrival of Islam in Egypt. During Pope Shenouda’s rule, the emigration of Copts increased tremendously as a consequence of better economic perspectives and a search for greater freedoms outside Egypt. Pope Shenouda responded to this trend by building hundreds of churches outside Egypt, whereby most (if not all) were personally consecrated by him.

And the conclusion that hints at the succession battle that has been rivaled only by the Mubarak succession question in Egypt’s public life:

For at least the past ten years there have been discussions about the succession of Pope Shenouda. Until 1928 only monks had been elected to the papacy. Three diocesan bishops had been elected to the papacy in the 20th century but that had also resulted in resistance by those who believe that the church should adhere to its ancient principles for the election of a new pope. Bishop Marcos of Shubra al-Khayma stated that Pope Shenouda himself saw no problem in the election of general bishop as pope as opposed to a diocesan bishop.

Just as the death of Pope Yousab in 1956 resulted in a struggle around the succession, so Father Musa of Beni Suef suspects a struggle over the succession of Pope Shenouda. There is division over who could be eligible (monks only or monks and general bishops). There are furthermore several ambitious bishops. For whoever will be elected, it will not be easy to stand in the shoes of a pope who had such a tremendous impact in his church and who has enjoyed so much popularity. Yet, for the church, it is important to soon have a strong new leader again in order to be able to safeguard the position of Christians in a country that is in transition following the Revolution of 2011.

At a time when bishops and other church leaders are publicly disagreeing on what presidential candidate they support, you bet this succession is going to be heated.

If you come up to me and tell me you’re a New Atheist and like the philosophers like Aristotle and Plato, I will punch the fucking shit out of you.

Do you know why we have their works? Muslims scholars and Christian theologians preserved them, commented upon them, and reinterpreted them.

Yeah, those same people you spend so much goddamn time  being assholes to and making fun of.

Fuck off.

entarteten:

Treacherous Alliance: The Secret Dealings of Israel, Iran, and the United States 
This is another good book one should look into if interested in these things…

Hmm, I’ll need to check this out. My knowledge of Iran and its history is embarrassingly bad. I’m reading through a lot of stuff by Dabashi right now to make up for that.

entarteten:

Treacherous Alliance: The Secret Dealings of Israel, Iran, and the United States

This is another good book one should look into if interested in these things…

Hmm, I’ll need to check this out. My knowledge of Iran and its history is embarrassingly bad. I’m reading through a lot of stuff by Dabashi right now to make up for that.

(Source: doctorofnothing)

thepoliticalnotebook:

Today, January 4th, marks the anniversary of the assassination of Punjab Governor Salman Taseer. He was assassinated in Islamabad a year ago by one of his own security guards, Mumtaz Qadri, who killed him over Taseer’s opposition to Pakistan’s anti-blasphemy law. 

Taseer’s death highlights the difficult role that extremist interpretations of religion play in Pakistan’s politics. His death remains divisive: while many supporters hold candlelight vigils, others mark the day by honoring Taseer’s assassin. Qadri was, surprisingly enough, sentenced for his actions, but the judge who ruled against him has since had to flee the country. One of Taseer’s sons, Shahbaz, was kidnapped in Lahore this August and has remained in captivity. 

In Dawn today, Badar Alam writes of Qadri:

He stands for subversion of the rule of law in the name of religious passion; he symbolises disregard for the code of professional conduct and institutional discipline under the garb of a self-declared war between religion and its real or imagined challengers; and, most essentially, his conduct is an affirmation of the state’s failure to regulate the society through constitutional, legal and administrative means.

[Photo via]

New York’s mayor expressed outrage Monday after a mosque was hit by a firebomb in an arson spree that police said they were investigating as a hate crime.

The Imam Al-Khoei Foundation building in the borough of Queens suffered damage to the front door from a Molotov cocktail thrown late Sunday, police said. Two similar attacks occurred in the same neighborhood, including one in a convenience store run by Muslims.

The foundation, which describes itself as the biggest international Shia Muslim organization, said on its website that two firebombs were “hurled at the main entrance” but that thankfully “no major damage no injury was caused by the blast.”

The statement said the foundation “reiterates its resolve to continue to serve the community and to strive to bring love where there is hatred, light where there is darkness and enlightenment where there is ignorance.”

In a statement Monday, Mayor Michael Bloomberg said the three Molotov cocktail attacks “stand in stark contrast to the New York City of today that we’ve built together.”

“Personnel from the NYPD’s Hate Crimes Unit and the 103rd Precinct’s Detective Squad are moving at full steam to investigate and also determine if there are any connections to incidents outside New York City,” Bloomberg said.

Shortly before the mosque incident and in the same part of New York, a general store known here as a bodega was struck with a similar device, consisting of a still-undetermined inflammable liquid in a glass Starbucks cafe bottle, a police spokesman said.

A source close to the investigation, who asked not to be identified, said that “the employees are Muslim.” The firebomb struck the counter area.

A third incident, occurring just one hour after the mosque attack, saw the same Starbucks bottle and accelerant weapon thrown at a private home used by a Hindu priest for ceremonies, police said. Nothing outside the house indicates its dual use as a temple, police said.

A fourth, more destructive attack on the same evening caused a major fire at a nearby private home, although there was no proof of links between this and the other incidents.

What exactly does “Biblically qualified” mean? I’ve read the Bible, and I don’t remember ever seeing a section entitled “Candidate Qualifications.”

  1. Camera: BlackBerry 9700

thenoobyorker:

kohenari:

I’ve become absolutely fascinated by the number of arguments I’ve seen recently about Ron Paul and racism. It doesn’t much matter to me if Ron Paul espouses racist ideas or has simply associated himself with people who do. But what amazes me is the lengths to which some people will go to defend Paul against any statement that doesn’t simply and straightforwardly crow about his many obvious virtues.

But my favorite argument of them all (here, here, and here, for example) is the one that says Ron Paul can’t hold any racist beliefs because he’s a libertarian and libertarianism is inherently an anti-racist philosophy insofar as it discourages any thinking about groups and only focuses on individuals (and their rights).

To see why this is nonsense, consider the following statements:

  • Leaders of the Communist Party in the Soviet Union or any of its Eastern European satellite states couldn’t possibly have owned private property because they were all committed Marxists and Marxism is inherently opposed to private ownership.
  • Throughout history, Christians have always been forgiving to one another and have always treated all human beings with the respect befitting their dignity because the Christian Bible teaches that forgiveness is one of the highest human virtues and that all human beings, as the beloved children of God, are brothers and sisters.

I could go on and on with these, but I’ll stop with just two. The logic in each one is delightful, except that we all know the statements are false.

Holding a particular philosophy, religion, or doctrine does not mean that a person necessarily follows its every tenet, or even its central one. People are notoriously bad about applying their beliefs consistently.

Here’s my post on this subject (which Alex selectively quotes above.)

One of the nation’s most influential imams, Zaid Shakir, leading a prayer at Occupy Oakland.